This video provides a short comparison between AWS S3 and Wasabi. This simple Wasabi approach to immutability is in contrast to a more complicated AWS S3 approach.
It is an important component in HIPAA, CJIS, FINRA, and other regulatory requirements. This protects data from accidental or malicious deletion or overwriting, bugs in application software, hackers, etc. Immutability: A Wasabi bucket can be made immutable by simply checking a box at the time of creation.Wasabi has a very strong storage offering with a lot of. In addition, with Wasabi, the time to first byte less time when compared with AWS S3. Wasabi is a relatively new kid on the block in the storage space. Performance: Wasabi has higher sustained read and write speeds.The only charges from Wasabi are storage (there are no additional charges for egress or API requests). Price: Wasabi charges roughly 1/5 th the price of AWS S3 for storage and has a much simpler pricing model.However, there are several important price and performance differences: This means any storage application that uses AWS S3 can also use Wasabi without any code changes to the storage application.īoth Wasabi and Amazon S3 offer high durability: eleven 9s (99.999999999%). including Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Dropbox, Backblaze B2, and Wasabi. Wasabi is designed to be 100% bit compatible with Amazon Web Services (AWS) S3. Backblaze B2 customers are eligible for 20 off a new copy of Retrospect.
0 kommentar(er)
